This is Part
8 of a
series of articles discussing the major provisions in each of the sections of
the Arizona REALTORS® Residential Resale Real Estate Purchase Contract (10/22) (“Contract”).
The previous articles in this
series can be located at Arizona Real Estate – A
Professional’s Guide to Law & Practice.
(arizonarealestateprofessionalguide.blogspot.com)
The Remedies Section of the Contract contains provisions that most people hope they will never have to utilize. However, if there is a potential breach of contract, it is important to understand each party’s rights and obligations. If there is a breach of contract, the rights and remedies are set forth in this section of the Contract, however if there is a breach, the broker should be notified and the parties should generally be referred to independent legal counsel.
Cure Period
A party is given an opportunity to cure a noncompliance
or potential breach of the contract. If a party fails to comply with any
provision of the Contract, the other party must deliver a notice to the
non-complying party specifying the non-compliance before declaring a breach. If
the non-compliance is not cured within three days after delivery of the notice
(cure period), the failure to comply may be declared to be a breach of
contract.
o
A breach of contract is the failure
to perform a contractual duty, or in other words, a broken promise.
o There are no automatic breaches in the Contract. The Cure Period Notice is always a prerequisite to declaring a breach of contract.
o There are situations where the Cure Period Notice could delay COE. For example, if, on the day of COE, the buyer discovers that the seller has failed to complete an agreed upon repair or a party fails to perform on the COE date.
·
The cure
period does not apply to a contingency.
o
A contingency is an event that must
occur before a party is obligated to perform their obligations set forth in the
Contract. A contingency is a condition, not a promise. If a contingency does
not occur, the party’s obligation to perform the contract never arises, so the
failure to perform a contingency is not a breach. If a contingency does not
occur, the Contract is unenforceable.
o
For example, the cure period does not apply to the
loan contingency. The Contract is contingent upon the buyer
obtaining loan approval without conditions, in other words qualifying for a
loan, by the COE Date. If the buyer in good faith fails to obtain loan
approval, or qualify for a loan, by the COE Date, the buyer’s obligation to
perform the Contract never arises. In such a case, the Contract is
unenforceable the next day, and the buyer is automatically entitled to the
return of the earnest money without further action by either party.
·
The Cure Period was included in the Contract
for a variety of reasons, including:
o
Dealing with all failures to comply
with the terms of the Contract in a uniform manner and prompting compliance.
o
Eliminating the question of whether
a breach has been waived -- because an action or inaction is not a breach until
the non-complying party is given notice and an opportunity to perform.
o
Bolstering the enforcement of the
time is of the essence clause and the ability to cancel the Contract for a
breach.
Breach
As discussed above, if after
receiving the notice of noncompliance the party does not perform the specified
obligation, the non-complying party may be declared in breach of contract. In
that event, the non-breaching party may pursue all legal remedies, subject to
the Alternative Dispute Resolution obligations set forth in the Contract.
· In the event of buyer’s breach, the seller may accept the earnest money as the sole right to damages.
This provision also states the obvious: an unfulfilled contingency is not a breach of contract.
Finally, the parties expressly agree that the failure of any party to comply with the terms and conditions of Section 1d to allow COE to occur on the COE Date, if not cured after a Cure Period notice is delivered pursuant to Section 7a, will constitute a material breach of the Contract, rendering the Contract subject to cancellation.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) – Mediation and Arbitration
· Mediation is a process in which the parties meet with an impartial person who helps to resolve the dispute informally and confidentially. Agreeing to mediate does not mean that the parties are agreeing to settle, but simply means the parties are trying to resolve a dispute without going to court. The parties do not give up any right to pursue other legal remedies if mediation is not successful.
·
Exclusions from ADR
The following matters are excluded from the requirement for
mediation and arbitration:
(i)
any action brought in the Small
Claims Division of an Arizona Justice Court (up to $3,500);
o
In Small Claims Court the case will
be heard by either a judge or hearing officer, who then makes a decision that is
final.
https://www.azcourts.gov/selfservicecenter/Small-Claims
(ii)
judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure
or other action or proceeding to enforce a deed of trust, mortgage, or
agreement for sale;
(iii)
an unlawful entry or detainer
action;
(iv)
the filing or enforcement of a
mechanics lien; or
(v) any matter that is within the
jurisdiction of a probate court.
The filing of a judicial action to record a lis pendens or order of attachment,
receivership, injunction, or other provisional remedies is not a waiver of the
obligation to submit the claim to alternative dispute resolution, or a breach
of the duty to mediate or arbitrate.
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
The prevailing party in any dispute is entitled to an award
of their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Conclusion
Most real estate transactions are completed without dispute.
However, there are times when a buyer or seller refuses to comply with the Contract
and perform a contractual duty, such as a refusal to close escrow or to make
agreed upon repairs. Although you cannot
give legal advice (unless you are also an attorney and authorized to act in
that capacity), it is important to know the options so you can point your
client in the right direction.
K.
Michelle Lind, Esq. is an attorney who currently serves Of Counsel to the
Arizona REALTORS®. She is also the
author of the book - Arizona Real Estate: A Professional's Guide to Law
and Practice (3rd Ed.) .
For more
real estate related articles, visit Michelle’s Blog at Arizona Real Estate – A Professional’s Guide to Law
& Practice. (arizonarealestateprofessionalguide.blogspot.com)
This
article is of a general nature and may not be updated or revised for accuracy
as statutory or case law changes following the date of first publication.
Further, this article reflects only the opinion of the author, is not intended
as definitive legal advice and you should not act upon it without seeking
independent legal counsel. 4/23/23
No comments:
Post a Comment