This is Part 6 of a series of articles
discussing the major provisions in each of the sections of the Arizona Association
of REALTORS® (“AAR”) Residential Resale Real Estate Purchase Contract (10/22) (“Contract”). The previous articles in this series can be
located at Arizona Real Estate – A Professional’s Guide to Law &
Practice. (arizonarealestateprofessionalguide.blogspot.com)
A warranty is a contractual assurance given by one party to the other. A warranty is a term of the contract but not a condition of the contract - it is a promise. A warranty entitles the non-breaching party to damages if the warranty is breached.
- In other words, the Contract states that the premises is being sold “as is.” (However, this does not preclude the buyer from asking the seller to repair disapproved items during the Inspection Period or as provided in the Contract.)
- Explain to the seller that “as is” does not mean that the seller can conceal defects in the property – the seller is still obligated to disclose all known material defects.
The seller does not warrant the condition, zoning or fitness for any particular use or purpose of the premises.
However, the seller is obligated to maintain and repair the premises so that the premises is in the following condition at the earlier of possession or close of escrow (“COE”).
·
All personal property not
included in the sale and all debris will be removed from the premises.
§ Prepare the seller to remove all their personal property and
trash from the premises by the time that the deed is recorded on the COE
date.
·
The premises, including all
additional existing personal property included in the sale, will be in substantially
the same condition as on the date of contract acceptance.
§ Since the seller is selling the
premises (which includes the fixtures and personal property included in the
Contract) in its present condition as of the date of contract, the parties
should document its present condition. Documentation
of the condition of the premises at time of Contract acceptance can prevent COE
disputes and can be done by:
§
the seller documenting the condition
in the SPDS, for example if the refrigerator or ice maker doesn’t work, note
that in the SPDS;
§
either party documenting the
condition in photos or other written descriptions at the time of Contract
acceptance.
·
All agreed
upon repairs/improvements will be
addressed pursuant to the Buyer Disapproval provisions in Section 6j.
§ Ensure that the seller understands that all agreed upon repairs/improvements
must be in a workmanlike manner (of good and acceptable quality) and must be
done by a licensed contractor if the repairs cost $1,000+, are not of a casual
or minor nature, or require a building permit pursuant to A.R.S.
§32-1121.
The buyer is again advised to conduct independent
inspections and investigations regarding the premises within the inspection
period. The buyer and seller also acknowledge they may, but are not obligated
to, negotiate for repairs/improvements to the premises.
Warranties that survive close of
escrow are promises that the seller makes that can be enforced by the buyer
after COE. The seller warranties that survive COE are the following.
o
This is the law – with or without the express warranty that survives COE.
·
That the seller has made payment
in full for all labor, professional services, materials, machinery, fixtures,
or tools furnished within the 150 days immediately preceding the COE in
connection with the construction, alteration, or repair of any structure on or
improvement to the premises.
o
This warranty is to avoid any
subsequent mechanics liens being recorded against the property.
o
If contractors or suppliers do not
get paid on a construction project, they can file a mechanics lien to secure
payment. Generally, a mechanics lien
must be filed within 120 days of completion of a project, after a preliminary 20-day
notice. A.R.S. 33-981 et. seq.
·
That the information provided by the
seller regarding connection to a sewer system or
on-site wastewater treatment facility is correct to the best of
seller’s knowledge.
o
Since a sewer system or on-site
wastewater treatment facility connection is a seller warranty that survives COE
(to the best of seller’s knowledge), if there is any doubt the seller should
verify the connection by employing a plumber, home inspector or other
professional.
o
If the home is not connected to a
public sewer, it is generally served by an on-site wastewater treatment
facility (conventional septic or alternative system).
§ If the property is served by a
conventional septic or alternative system, use the On-Site Wastewater Treatment Facility Addendum.
§ A qualified inspector must inspect a conventional septic or
alternative system within six months prior to transfer of ownership.
The buyer warrants that the buyer has disclosed any
information that may materially and adversely affect the buyer’s ability to
close escrow and that the buyer has conducted all desired independent
inspections and investigations and accepts the premises at the earlier of
possession of the premises or COE.
·
The
buyer’s obligation to disclose any known information that the buyer is or may
be unable to perform is the law - with or without this express warranty.
The buyer also warrants that the buyer is not relying on any verbal representations concerning the premises except as disclosed on the line in this subsection.
- The
buyer should never be relying on any verbal representations. Allegations of verbal representations
are common in many disputes and lawsuits.
- The
fact that the buyer is not relying on any verbal representations is
confirmed by writing “none” on lines 211-212 under the buyer’s warranties
provisions. If the buyer indicates
that they are relying on a verbal representation when writing an offer –
stop – and assist the buyer in confirming the representation in writing
before completing the offer if at all possible. If not, consult your broker or manager
and make sure that the representation is confirmed in writing during the inspection
period.
Conclusion
The warranties in the Contract are basic promises, but
important ones. If either the buyer or
seller breaks one of these warranted promises, they could be liable to the
other party for damages.
K. Michelle Lind, Esq. is an attorney who currently serves
Of Counsel to the Arizona REALTORS®. She
is also the author of the book - Arizona Real Estate: A Professional's Guide to
Law and Practice (3rd Ed.)
.
For more real estate related articles, visit Michelle’s Blog at Arizona Real Estate – A Professional’s Guide to Law & Practice. (arizonarealestateprofessionalguide.blogspot.com)
This article is of a general nature and may not be updated or revised for accuracy as statutory or case law changes following the date of first publication. Further, this article reflects only the opinion of the author, is not intended as definitive legal advice and you should not act upon it without seeking independent legal counsel. 4/12/23
No comments:
Post a Comment